Small Changes, Real Progress

LISTENING • B2 PRE-ADVANCED • INFERENCE

Listening for inference

Choose the best answer. What do Nora and Malik really mean?

🔄 Changing your mind 🧠 Inference 🎧 B2 listening

1. Why is Nora initially cautious about changing one’s mind?

2. What caused Nora to reconsider the remote-first policy?

3. What does Malik suggest happens when a belief becomes part of someone’s identity?

4. Why does Malik recommend asking what would change your mind?

5. What is the main conclusion of the debate?

Small Changes, Real Progress

LISTENING • B2 PRE-ADVANCED • FILL THE GAPS

The Skill of Changing Your Mind

Type the missing exact words. Empty answers are ignored.

🔄 Changing your mind ✍️ Exact words ✅ Check only filled

1. Nora says changing your mind too often can make you ___.

2. Nora agrees that people should respond to ___.

3. Changing the remote-work policy carried a ___.

4. Malik says a belief can become connected to a ___.

5. Nora realises that part of her was ___.

6. Malik recommends asking ___.

7. The amount of change should depend on the ___.

8. New evidence led Nora to a ___ about the method.

9. Malik compares changing your mind to ___.

10. Responsible revision can be a form of ___.

Small Changes, Real Progress

LISTENING • B2 PRE-ADVANCED • TIMELINE

The Skill of Changing Your Mind

Put the ideas in order from 1 to 10. Empty items are ignored.

🔄 Changing your mind 🧭 Sequence 🧠 Critical thinking

The speakers distinguish careless inconsistency from responsible revision based on clear standards.

Malik argues that refusing to update a view may be stubbornness rather than strength.

They explain how to communicate a revised position clearly without pretending the original view was foolish.

Junior employees describe problems with learning, relationships, and asking for help remotely.

Nora says frequent changes can make a person appear unreliable.

Malik recommends deciding in advance what kind of evidence would justify changing a belief.

They conclude that evidence-based revision can be a form of intellectual courage.

Nora recognises that she focused on productivity data that supported her original position.

Nora describes strongly supporting a remote-first policy for her department.

Nora publicly changes the policy and introduces two shared office days each week.

Small Changes, Real Progress

Audio 26: A Routine That Fit My Life Урок курса: 26. Формат: монолог. Слов: 566. Hi, I’m Daniel. A while ago, I went to a routine health appointment and discovered that the hardest questions were not the medical ones. The nurse asked what a normal working day looked like. I began with the answer I usually gave: busy, but generally fine. Then she asked me to describe the previous Tuesday. I had skipped breakfast, spent most of the morning sitting, and eaten lunch while answering messages. In the evening, I had been too tired to cook, so I ordered food and stayed on the sofa. I went to bed late because it felt like the first part of the day that belonged to me. Describing one actual day sounded different from describing my lifestyle in general. I was not simply busy. I had built a routine in which rest and regular meals were always waiting for a better moment. I told the nurse that I wished I had more discipline. She did not turn that into a lecture. She asked what happened on days when things went better. I realised that I ate more regularly when I worked near a colleague who took a proper lunch break. I also enjoyed walking when it had a purpose, such as meeting a friend or collecting something from a shop. The appointment did not produce a dramatic diagnosis or a perfect plan. We discussed my concerns, and I followed up with the healthcare professional as advised. What stayed with me was a practical question: which changes could I actually repeat during an ordinary week? My first idea was ambitious. I would prepare every meal, exercise each morning, and stop using my phone after nine. By the next day, I could already see the problem. I was designing a routine for someone with predictable hours and unlimited energy. That person was not me. So I chose two smaller arrangements. I kept something simple available for lunch, and twice a week I arranged to walk with a friend after work. These were personal choices, not a programme I expected everyone else to follow. On days when my schedule changed, I adjusted rather than treating the whole week as a failure. My friend was helpful in an unexpected way. He did not congratulate me every time I made a healthy choice. He simply treated the walk as something we had agreed to do together. It became part of our social life instead of another performance I had to measure. There were awkward moments too. When a colleague commented on what I was eating, I said I would rather we did not discuss my lunch. I was happy to talk about my routine, but I did not want every meal to become a public judgement. Setting that boundary made the changes easier to continue. I still wish I had noticed the pattern earlier, and some weeks remain difficult. I have also learned not to explain every period of tiredness by blaming my habits. If something concerns me, I seek appropriate professional advice rather than assuming that a better schedule must solve it. What changed was the way I understood looking after my health. It stopped being a promise to become a completely different person. It became a series of choices I could discuss, adapt, and return to. A routine is useful when it supports your life, not when your life has to disappear in order to follow it.